Rugby Championship 2014 – Round 5 – The Mighty Springbok returns!

South Africa vs Australia
Final Score – SA 28/Aus 10
Cape Town

For me this game was definitely one of the highlights of the Championship this year.  The last ten minutes of the game and the Springboks breathtaking performance will go down as a vintage rugby classic.  The whole game was good and kept everyone on the edge of their seats but the Springboks in the last ten minutes showed us what can be done once you get the planning and the chemistry right.  As a result we witnessed a breathtaking spectacle which surely must have gladdened the hearts of Springbok fans who have, for much of this tournament so far, been left feeling frustrated and confused.  If South Africa can build on this effort next weekend against New Zealand and learn how to do it away from home then South Africa’s chances at next year’s World Cup look good – correction VERY good.

However, before we get too carried away let’s also temper our enthusiasm with some hard facts.  The Springboks were trailing the visitors at half time and for much of the first half did not look the dominant side.  Something happened in the changing room at half time.  South Africa came back onto the pitch full of serious intent.  With twenty minutes to go, Meyer elected to bring on some old soldiers of the Springbok pack and this seemed to breathe a new sense of life and urgency into their efforts.  South Africa played with a great deal of intent in the first half but once again lacked composure and were deficient in execution.  Far too many handling errors were made despite an obvious willingness to run the ball and take Australia on up front.  However that man Cornal Hendricks who has continued to impress throughout the entire Championship on the wing, linked up brilliantly with Willie le Roux who then was stopped by a brilliant Wallaby tackle.  Nevertheless Hendricks speed and sidestepping ability plus his skill in a perfect offload to le Roux were spectacular to watch and South Africa were unlucky not to get the try.  Fortune favoured the Springboks though as continued forward pressure eventually saw Marcel Coetzee crash over for the try in a well worked forward effort through the maul.  South Africa looked like they were starting to click.

Australia rose to the challenge as the game swung back into their ascendancy and they led going into the second half.  There was obviously much talk in the Springbok dressing room at half time about cleaning up the schoolboy errors, holding on to the ball much more and generally shoring up their game plan.  I would go so far as to say that Heineke Meyer looked almost calm – a rare sight and he has obviously been studying videos of poker face All Black coach Steve Hansen.

Halfway through the second half, Schalk Burger came on to replace Teboho Mohoje who received a standing ovation from the crowd as he walked off the field after his debut as a Springbok, and which hopefully silenced the offensive press speculation of the week before as to whether he had been selected on the basis of the color of his skin or merit.  Mohoje was impressive in his debut and is one to watch for the future.  Schalk Burger, who has never been one of my favourite players due to his reckless style of play at times which leads to too many breakdowns in discipline, effectively silenced me as a critic in this game.  The man was simply immense and performed a one man demolition of Australia’s defences.  Bakkies Botha, another old soldier, seemed to thrive on his old teammate’s enthusiasm and the old guard of Botha, Burger, du Plessis and Matfield left Australia’s defences in tatters.  Watching these old warriors’ enjoyment of the task at hand was infectious for players and spectators alike.  Some of the younger new blood was thrown into the mix with the young but experienced Pat Lambie coming in at fly half for Handre Pollard who finally showed in this match that Meyer’s faith in him was justified.  Cobus Reinach the new scrum half came in for Francois Hougaard who also had a stellar game.  The rest was history as we watched entranced as the Springboks scored three unanswered tries and a drop goal all in the last ten minutes of the game.  In short – incredible!  I cannot remember the last time I have enjoyed ten minutes of rugby so much.  If this is the new look Springboks, then the world need take notice for 2015.  The final showpiece of the tournament at Ellis Park next weekend in Johannesburg against the old enemy, the All Blacks is shaping up to be a cracker at this rate!

As for Australia, there are some positives to take away from this game heading into next weekend’s decisive encounter with the Pumas in Argentina.  Tevita Kuridrani was electric and linked up with Matt Toomua at the centre was devastatingly effective in punching huge holes in the South African defence.  Had it not been for some brilliant last ditch South African defence then Kuridrani would have been over the white chalk for Australia at least twice in the first half.  However, apart from that Australian management has some serious soul searching to do on the plane to Argentina.  In the second half Australia’s forward pack was torn apart by South Africa and as they go up against the best scrum in world rugby right now next weekend, that surely is a concern.  Furthermore in the last fifteen minutes of the game, Australia looked exhausted and increasingly bereft of any answers to the relentless South African pressure.  In short, they were run ragged and seemed unable to play together effectively as a team.  Emergency surgery is needed quickly and of Australia and South Africa I think the Springboks will be more effective in preparing for the two very difficult final tests both sides face next week against the Pumas and All Blacks.

Argentina vs New Zealand
Final Score – NZ 34/Arg 13
La Plata

Probably the weakest game of the tournament so far for the Pumas and as I said last week, hopefully not a repetition of their fortunes at this stage of the competition last year.  That is not to say that they played badly, it was just that the All Blacks were just too good.

If you had read the form books and predictions leading up to this match, then to be honest there is not much else to report.  The All Blacks looked to clinch the Championship in this game and thus the silverware, and as a result put up a class performance that got the job done with no margin of error.  The Pumas were left having to play a valiant game of catch up rugby as they sought to salvage some pride from the whole affair.

New Zealand were clinical and ruthless and produced a blistering display of rugby that showed just how well they were prepared for this game.  They expertly played to the Pumas’ strengths, especially up front and as a result their devastating backline were free to cast their magic, which they did in four skillfully worked tries.  High school coaches around the world should tape this game and show it to their charges as an example of how to master every aspect of the modern game.  Beauden Barrett at fly half was once again superb and despite the drama in the New Zealand press at Aaron Cruden missing the flight to Argentina due to an excess of drinking the night before, showed the world that a lack of depth at number 10 is simply something New Zealand does not suffer from

The All Black backline of Conrad Smith, Israel Dagg, Julian Savea, Ben Smith and newcomer Malakai Fekitoa were all outstanding on attack and defence and given superb quick ball by the impressive Aaron Smith at scrum half.  For me there is no question that Aaron Smith has without doubt been the scrum half of the tournament.  Smith’s work rate has been impressive and his coverage of all areas of the park is outstanding coupled with an ability to effectively tackle players more than twice his size.  If you look at this New Zealand performance you realize you are watching a team that has welded all the necessary composite skills of the game into one unit – in short the world’s only true complete team at the moment

Argentina,meanwhile, fought valiantly and took some consolation in a brilliantly worked try at the end of the game that had been looming throughout the match.  They had threatened throughout the game but as usual just lacked that vital finishing touch.   Nevertheless their defence was strong and they certainly looked threatening with ball in hand – at no point in the match did they look like a pushover.  They were able to compete against New Zealand for 80 minutes, it’s just they couldn’t ultimately take apart a team that was clinically focused on putting the finishing touches on their claim for this year’s Rugby Championship.  If Argentina can build on the positives from this match then I would give them the edge against Australia next weekend in Mendoza.

Fixtures this weekend

South Africa vs New Zealand – Johannesburg

It’s going to be a clash of the titans next Saturday at Ellis Park, as although the Championship is now well and truly decided, a Springbok/All Black encounter in South Africa always has an epic aura around it.  Last year’s fixture was one of THE games of the year and next weekend’s meeting looks set to be much of the same.  A fast, furious and intensely physical contest is what we can expect to see at Ellis Park as the two best sides in the world re-enact one of international rugby’s greatest rivalries.  Both the Springboks and All Blacks hold each other in great esteem and thus a victory is a true vindication of skill on the day – expect no quarters to be given

At this stage it is impossible to predict who will emerge the victor.  Technically New Zealand clearly has the edge, but after the Springboks spectacular end of match annihilation of the Wallabies last weekend in Cape Town, the South Africans are catching up fast to their Kiwi counterparts.  Throw into the mix a fervent and passionate home crowd in one of international test rugby’s great cathedral grounds and the Springboks will be very hard to beat if they keep up the standard they showed the world in Cape Town.  Heineke Meyer finally seems to be consolidating a strong team with a clear sense of what they have to do and how they have to play in order to beat the best in the world.  The new talent that South Africa has chosen to invest in is starting to show clear promise and overall the Springboks are hopefully finally starting to move in the right direction.

New Zealand on the other hand will recognize this and will no doubt somehow notch their game up yet another level if that is even possible, considering they are consistently setting the benchmark on how to play the game.  They regard any win against the Springboks as critical to maintaining the All Black legend and hold the Springboks in greater regard despite past performances than probably any other team in world rugby.  South Africa will bring their A game but expect New Zealand to bring their A+ game.  With two such evenly matched and powerful teams, anyone with a heart condition or frail nerves should probably look away next Saturday – it’s going to be a roller coaster ride!

Argentina vs Australia – Mendoza

For those of us who have Argentina as their favourite underdog team, Saturday’s fixture in the heartland of Argentine rugby will be a nerve wracking affair.  I would not use Argentina’s performance against the All Blacks as the basis of predicting the result.  The Pumas will be up for this and sensing blood after seeing Australia implode against the Springboks in South Africa.  Add to that various elements of discord in the Wallaby camp and Australia could be ripe for the taking.  The question is at the end of the Championship can Argentina take all the lessons they have learnt this past six weeks and put them all together to produce the curtain call performance of their Championship?  Of concern to them will be the absence of Juan Martin Fernandez Lobbe who although not Captain, this duty having been passed to the inspirational Augustin Creevy, is still nevertheless a spiritual talisman for the rest of the team.  However, if they can go into this match feeling proud of their consistent improvement over the last six weeks and determined to get that first win, then I think it is there for the taking with the home crowd making more than enough noise to provide that additional motivation.  Patience, composure and sticking to the skills and core strengths of the Pumas should see them through against a Wallaby side brimming with talent but lacking cohesion.

That being said, Australia will not come to Mendoza with their tails between their legs.  They have everything to prove and furthermore know the grilling they will get on their return home if it is their scalp which is to be the Pumas first in the Rugby Championship.  Australia have the talent but as mentioned above lack the cohesion.  Furthermore, I cannot see a weary and at times weak Australian forward pack being able to stand up to the Pumas phenomenal scrum and set of forwards.  Australia have shown consistent weaknesses in the scrum and Argentina probably have the best scrum in world rugby right now.  If Australia cannot match the challenge the Pumas will give them in this area, then I foresee increasing fatigue starting to set in on the side of the Wallabies.  This in turn seems to lead to frustration for Australia and a corresponding lack of discipline at the breakdown.  If Argentina consistently gain the upper hand in the scrum, then I think the last twenty minutes of the game will see Australia start to fall apart and a certain sense of desperation set in.  Nevertheless many pundits predicted a strong Argentinian win for this fixture in last year’s Championship and it ended up being a comprehensive thrashing of the Pumas by the Wallabies.  If Australia come prepared and with a healthy dose of respect for their opponents and dismiss last year’s result as a completely different scenario than the one they will face this weekend, their chances to  come away with a win are good.  On the other hand a misplaced sense of confidence and lack of discipline by Australia will see the Pumas get the result that everyone has been predicting for so long.  We wait and see who has done their homework for what looks set to be a fascinating encounter.

Rugby Championship – Round 5 Preview

Fixtures this weekend

South Africa vs Australia – Cape Town

Undoubtedly the fixture of the weekend, as these two sides slug it out to see who really is the second best team in the world after the All Blacks. With the All Blacks most likely clinching the Championship this weekend in Argentina, this match is about standings and developing both national teams for next year’s World Cup.  In this regard I commend Heineke Meyer’s selection.  He has boldly chosen to  blood younger players for whom this kind of big game experience will be invaluable in preparing them for the Rugby World Cup next year.  Furthermore in two standout selections he has chosen to continue to favour Jan Serfontein over Damien de Allende at centre and made the bold move of selecting the uncapped Teboho Mohoje at flanker over Schalk Burger.

In the latter selection there has been much talk in the press, mainly outside of South Africa, as to whether this has been based on colour or ability. As far as I am concerned this is insulting to both South African rugby and Teboho himself.  While I can understand some in the media jumping to the conclusion that Mohoje has been selected on the basis of color as he is an uncapped Springbok for such an important game, it is nevertheless irrelevant.  Were the media asking the same question of white uncapped players at the start of the Championship?  For all intents and purposes South Africa has lost the Rugby Championship and as a result the priority is now to use such big games to develop the talent for next year’s World Cup.  On the basis of this and Mohoje’s form with the Cheetahs then his selection is more than justified.  Let us ignore this pointless debate about the status of the colour bar in South African rugby and instead focus on where the Springboks need to look for a side capable of bringing home the Webb Ellis trophy next year and how to develop the players to do this.

Australia come to Cape Town with a new found sense of confidence that mirrors their initial strong showing against the All Blacks in the first round of the Championship. Despite the schooling they received from the All Blacks in Auckland in the second round of the Championship they have shown that they have a talented side capable of producing results when it matters, as shown by the at home wins against Argentina and South Africa.  However if we look closely at those wins, it is evident that this side although talented can be beaten.  Let’s face it Australia were lucky to win in Perth against the Springboks, and had South Africa hung on to the ball more, played a smarter tactical game and not been victims of a questionable refereeing decision the score line would not have been in Australia’s favor.  In the match against the Pumas, another 5 minutes and the score would have been at least a try if not an outright win for the Pumas as they stormed back against Australia in the second half.  Therefore we are looking at a side that JUST wins matches and this in the long term against quality opposition will not be good enough if Australia want to live up to their claim that they are the second best team in the world.

South Africa on the other hand I think will begin to gel and start to get consistently better provided players and management can come to agreement on an effective game plan. If Meyer can stick with a consistent selection in the next few matches that blends new talent and experience, there is no question in my mind that South Africa will be the team to challenge in next year’s World Cup after the All Blacks.

So in short, my prediction is a gruelling encounter that runs close for the first 60 minutes, but with a passionate crowd in Cape Town, I see the Boks pulling comfortably ahead in the last quarter leaving Australia with too many question marks. The weather is expected to be good and with two teams having the ability to play great running rugby, it should be a fast paced game.  Either way an exciting contest looms!

Argentina vs New Zealand – La Plata 

For everyone who is a Pumas supporter, this match is regarded with some degree of trepidation. In last year’s Championship, after an impressive opening four games the Pumas looked set to continue this form at home in their final two games.  Although no one expected them to seriously challenge the All Blacks, everyone was convinced that their last game against Australia would be the definitive match for them where they would take their first win in the tournament.  Sadly their last two games at home last year were a total anticlimax and the Pumas exited the Championship with a whimper, with many arguing that their last game against Australia was their weakest performance of the whole Championship.

So this year we watch with bated breath. The Pumas although having no wins so far to show for their efforts this year in the Championship, have played some superb rugby.  These last two fixtures at home should be the catalyst to allow them to show the world that they mean business next year at the World Cup.  The game against New Zealand will be challenging and given the All Blacks superlative form, no one expects them to win but if they can run the All Blacks close and take this momentum into the game against Australia the following weekend a victory is surely there for the taking.

As for New Zealand, for them the rest of the Championship is merely a formality in terms of silverware on offer as they have for all intents wrapped up the tournament. They have unquestionably been the form team and deserve the title of Champions.  However, they will still want to put in a good performance in Argentina as the two teams will be opponents in the pool stages of next year’s World Cup, and the All Blacks are very aware that Argentina will be an even better team by that stage.  Furthermore a good effort in Argentina will help New Zealand face South Africa in Johannesburg next week, which is already being billed as one of the games to watch this year.  Therefore New Zealand will seek to show that the loss of Aaron Cruden this weekend and his replacement by the exceptionally capable Beauden Barrett means that the All Black machine can easily weather the odd PR mess up and lack of team discipline as they simply have so much depth to call on.

So on the table at the end of the day for both teams is the need to put in a good showing regardless of positions in the Championship. For Argentina it will be to prove to their adoring fans that the hard work of August and September has developed a Pumas side for the rest of the rugby world to reckon with, while for New Zealand it will be consolidation of the world’s best side and to maintain their unstoppable momentum for the curtain call clash with South Africa next week.  Let’s hope both sides can deliver!

Rugby Championship 2014 – 4th round, winner takes all

New Zealand vs South Africa
Final score – NZ 14/SA 10
Wellington

As predicted, the Springboks dug deep and finally came up with a performance which although not perfect was nevertheless a considerable step up from their previous three outings in the Championship. It would appear that Heineke Meyer may finally have the semblance of a reasonable game plan, and with the Rugby Championship inevitably lost to New Zealand at this stage of the competition, he is probably correct in using the remaining games to really solidify a team featuring many younger and less experienced players against world class opposition. This experience and the November Internationals in Europe will be critical in boosting South Africa’s chances at next year’s World Cup.

The positives were there for all to see. South Africa’s scrum and lineout were vastly improved and the new blood seemed to contribute significantly to this. Handre Pollard at fly half it must be said played a good game in a tense and difficult encounter and if he keeps it up he looks to be a serious contributor to South Africa’s World Cup challenge next year. Jan Serfontein at centre was a far superior player to the nonexistent De Allende as a newcomer and if Meyer has any common sense he will put his efforts into promoting and developing this young player who has serious potential. Cornal Hendricks once again on the wing showed his blistering pace scoring yet another spectacular try. If he doesn’t get recognition as winger of the tournament then there is no justice.

However, despite this improved Springbok performance, South Africa nevertheless ultimately showed signs of creaking under pressure, going from a half time lead to ultimately losing the game in the second half through too many unforced errors. Yes as always is was wet and windy in Wellington but this is still no excuse. South Africa must learn to improve their skills in such conditions otherwise they are not a contender in the world game. Fatigue and a lack of discipline reared its ugly head once more for the Springboks in the second half and in this game it cannot be blamed on poor refereeing, as unlike the previous games in the Championship the standard of refereeing this weekend was top notch in both games. Furthermore, there was far too much kicking away of good possession and the replacement of Ruan Pienaar by Francois Hougaard due to injury, seemed to only heighten this tendency. I have to confess that although I am one of his biggest fans, Willie le Roux was also guilty of kicking more often than running the ball, and indeed has tended to favour this option too much during the course of the Championship. I still hold that he is one of best of the Springboks current pack, but can’t help feel that he needs to sort this aspect of his game out, and hopefully the next two contests will show this has been done.

South Africa did manage to find a second wind in the last ten minutes of the game which saw them steadfastly camped in the New Zealand half of the field. Several opportunities to cross the white line went missing. Handre Pollard did manage to take a great drop goal and put them within four points. In the last five minutes a heroic All Black defence managed to keep out a veritable Springbok onslaught, but once again unforced errors kept the Springboks away from those last desperate five points and thus the win. It was close, it was nail-biting but in the end New Zealand showed once more how they are the masters of leaping from the jaws of defeat at the last minute.

New Zealand played a good game, but once again although heroic in defence in the last ten minutes showed that they are not invincible and can be beaten. South Africa had the All Blacks on the ropes on several occasions. What saved New Zealand was their dogged determination and ability to maintain their composure right to the end. They dominated possession for much of the game and showed South Africa that hanging onto the ball is preferable to kicking it away, please take note Heineke Meyer. Nevertheless, South Africa’s defence in light of their lack of possession was superlative and vastly improved showing that they are still one of the hardest teams in the world to get past physically. When South Africa did have the ball they looked dangerous and it is frustrating for any Springbok supporter that we didn’t get to see more of this. We can only hope that in Cape Town in two weeks, South Africa takes this to heart and shows us a powerful defence and a great running game, which they certainly have the potential to do. It would seem that the experimentation with the side of the last few weeks is now over and now it is time to produce results and build on every game – let’s hope for both the Springboks and world rugby that that is the case and we are in for some great rugby spectacles.

Australia vs Argentina
Final score – Aus 32/Arg 25
Brisbane

Hands up if you are frustrated Pumas supporter. As the world’s great underdog team with a committed fan base across the globe, Argentina excite us but ultimately disappoint us. We all know they have it in them and that this side is approaching the greatness of the Pumas’ 2007 World Cup side – it’s just we get so many tantalising glimpses but so few results.

There is no question that Argentina started this match against the Wallabies poorly, but from the second half till the end found that missing ingredient to suddenly ramp up their game. They should have won this game, but to not at least get the draw is disappointing beyond belief. A lack of patience, composure and discipline in the dying minutes of the game saw them lose an obvious try right beneath the posts which would have been an easy conversion ending the match in a draw. We can forgive them not winning the match but there is no doubt that we all are a bit disgruntled at the loss. If we feel that – then how must the Pumas feel? There is little point in rehashing the point every week that the Pumas lack that finishing touch and the composure and concentration to make them that killer side. The potential is there but not the execution. If unlike last year’s competition they can go into these last two games at home in front of their adoring fans with their heads held high and determined to get their first win in this Championship – they should and I emphasise ‘should’ be able to finally show us what they are capable of. A strong showing against New Zealand should then translate into a win in their last game of the Championship against Australia. I won’t say anything more – they know what they have to do.

As for Australia, despite them getting the win, I am not convinced that this is a great side and furthermore find it hard to believe that the Webb Ellis trophy could end up living in Australia after 2015 for a few years. They have eked out some meagre wins but more due to errors made by the opposition than their own skill or style of play. The forwards are less than impressive and Australia have yet to find a halfback combination that really outshines any of those offered by their respective oppositions. Meanwhile their backs are fast but unimpressive in defence. The only really standout player for me this Championship for Australia has been Michael Hooper at flanker who has impressed with a huge work rate and some blistering runs in all four games. While Israel Folau is impressive when cut loose he appears weak in defence especially with ball in hand and his resulting kicking game shows a serious lack of technical understanding of the game.

There is no question that Ewen McKenzie has made significant improvements since taking over at the end of 2013, but has yet to really produce a side that is the finished product and one that is able to clinically outclass the other big teams in world rugby. Sure they may get the wins but they are unlikely to dominate any team to the point where you could see them getting consistent wins over the big teams. On the basis of their current form I think Australia will struggle in November in Europe, especially against England and Ireland. Like Heineke Meyer Ewen McKenzie has a lot of work to do between now and the World Cup. In that regard for both coaches the last two games of the Rugby Championship will be critical in setting a sound platform for the November tours to Europe and resulting consolidation of their sides for next year’s World Cup.

Refereeing consistency please!

With not much to report on the home front in Canada we skip our usual wrap up of the game in Canada and use this opportunity to take a look at an issue that sadly is in danger of detracting from the enjoyment of our great game – refereeing.

Last weekend’s potential spectacles were marred by poor refereeing which in some people’s view directly influenced the outcome of a pair of critical games for the four competing sides. I for one tend to disagree that the refereeing albeit sloppy determined the outcome of the games. As mentioned earlier it is inevitable that in the frenetic pace of International Test Rugby one or two decisions will rightly or wrongly go against you and teams must learn to adapt to this. Blaming the referee for bad calls is no panacea for a teams’ weak performance. South Africa lost last week because ultimately they played poorly and when it mattered most did not rise to the challenge. The Pumas lost not because they were denied a try and had their superior scrum subjected to some bizarre interpretations. At least Argentina were humble enough to admit that it was their concentration that let them down and the fact that they were playing a superior side.

Nevertheless there is no question that poor refereeing can influence a team’s morale on the field especially if they are being penalised for incorrect calls or subjective interpretations of the rules. In both games George Clancy and Pascal Gauzere were guilty of this. Pascal Gauzere called Leonardo Senatore’s charge down a knock-on and thus disallowed a brilliant and perfectly legitimate try by the Pumas. This coupled with him constantly penalizing Argentina at the breakdown and letting New Zealand completely off the hook, especially in the scrum where Argentina were clearly and legally superior, it is not surprising that a certain weariness and frustration set in amongst the Pumas leading to the critical lapses in concentration that ultimately lost them the game. If it is perceived by a team that there is a certain bias against them by the referee, it is inevitable that confusion and a lack of coherence in gameplay sets in. This is inexcusable in International Test Rugby where the margins for error are so small.

As for George Clancy and his controversial yellow card given to Bryan Habana the same applies. There is no question that South Africa played poorly based on a totally ineffective game plan given the conditions. However, given the fact that they are a big and physical side the contact nature of their game will always be rather intense. In this area they were much more noticeable and effective than Australia. However, despite completely legal albeit powerful tackling this style was perceived as foul play on several occasions by George Clancy. Teams should adopt their game plan to the conditions on the pitch not the style and perceptions of the referee. If this happens then sadly the team in question is playing at referee psychology and not focusing on the game at hand and the strategy required to win. It was obvious that this was affecting the Springboks on Saturday in Perth and in this area they deserve our empathy. Like I say it doesn’t detract from the fact that they ultimately threw a game they should have won, but having to deal with the constant discrepancies in George Clancy’s refereeing did not help their cause.

The International Rugby Board has to take a much more proactive role in training and disciplining referees. Rugby teams should be playing each other not the referee as well. Furthermore if we are to generate greater interest in our glorious game, newcomers will be put off by rules that seem to change from game to game. Consistency is the key here. One possible solution I saw put forward that I think has a great deal of merit is a challenge system like there is in professional tennis. Each team would be allowed to challenge a set number of referee calls per match. There would be a limit placed on these challenges, I would argue that no more than 1 per team per half, so a total of two per game per team. However if the crowd sees it on the replay on the big screen and the players know that it is a questionable call it would seem fair that a review much like the television match official ruling on tries would be appropriate. If we are to generate a level playing field for players and referees and the enjoyment of rugby’s devoted fans then surely something along these lines must be incorporated into the modern game.

The IRB says it is committed to simplifying the game and promoting fair and free running rugby – well then put your money where your mouth is gentlemen!

Rugby Championship 2014 – Excuse me, ref!

New Zealand vs Argentina
Final score – NZ 28/Arg 9
Napier

We will leave out the fact that the refereeing of this game was poor and discuss that later. It detracted from what was a solid contest and one in which the Pumas made the All Blacks work hard for 80 minutes. The only thing I will say on the refereeing is that the score was actually 28-14 (16 if the Pumas would have converted the try they were denied by the referee). In this day and age with the technology we have at our disposal, to disallow Leonardo Senatore’s try from a perfectly legitimate charge down of an All Black kick was scandalous and no doubt seriously affected the Pumas morale as they could legitimately feel that the referee was biased against them no matter how well they played.

However, as impressive as Argentina was they nevertheless were, as was expected, ultimately taught a lesson by the clinically superior All Blacks. As a spectator this was perhaps most evident when New Zealand scored their second try through Liam Messam. It was Argentina’s put in at the scrum and they, as for most of the game, comfortably won the scrum challenge and then for some reason lost concentration. The ball popped forward off an Argentine foot back into the hands of New Zealand, and into the lightning quick hands of scrum half Aaron Smith who demonstrated his awareness of how to create quick space and the end result was Liam Messam crashing across the white line. For me this sums up Argentina’s quintessential problem, it is a game of 80 minutes gentlemen at this level, and up against a side like New Zealand you can NEVER relax for a second. Nobody expected Argentina to win this game, including Argentina themselves; however you could see that they were shocked that they threw away a very credible performance against the world’s best side on such temporary lapses of concentration.

Nevertheless, despite this it was a good game in tough conditions. Once again though New Zealand demonstrated to the world what extraordinary depth they have in their team. Beauden Barrett was outstanding at 10, even though he struggled to convert New Zealand’s tries. This was resolved as New Zealand pulled another star fly half off the bench in the form of Colin Slade who promptly proceeded to make all his goal kicks. It is official, somewhere deep in the Southern Alps is a secret factory that produces world class number tens – look at the list for the current All Black selectors – Dan Carter, Aaron Cruden, Beauden Barrett and Colin Slade. The rest of the world doesn’t stand a chance.

Argentina are still to be credited however with putting in a big performance. They matched New Zealand up front in the scrums and in the lineouts. Their running game although not as visionary as New Zealand’s was still commendable and they never gave up. In weather that was less than ideal, Argentina continued to show that against the world’s best team they have come a VERY long way. Had they not been disallowed a perfectly acceptable try by the bizarre interpretation of the game’s rules by the referee then the actual score line would have been much closer. As New Zealand’s Richie McCaw pointed out after the match, New Zealand were made to work hard by a team that is on the cusp of something great – Australia take note!

 

Australia vs South Africa
Final score – Aus 24/SA 23
Perth

How best to describe this game? In my humble opinion a truly mediocre performance from the 2nd and 3rd best ranked teams in the world, which left many including yours truly wondering how they even hold these rankings in the first place. It was windy and wet in Perth and neither team played with any great degree of understanding of the conditions they were faced with, and quite frankly either team would have been lucky to get a result based on their style of play. There has been much discussion of the appalling refereeing provided by Irish referee George Clancy but as mentioned above this will be discussed later. Nevertheless it is inevitable that refereeing decisions are going to go against you from time to time but this is no excuse to throw games, and that is quite frankly what South Africa did against a poor Australian side that then proceeded to capitalise on a demoralised and weak South African team.

In short we did not witness a rugby spectacle from two of the world’s best sides. Instead we saw a collection of schoolboy rugby errors made all the more comical by weak refereeing. South Africa started strongly, with once again the undisputed star of the Springbok side at the moment, Cornal Hendricks on the wing scoring another superlative try out wide. Coach Heineke Meyer’s decision to start the experienced Morne Steyn at fly half seemed to pay dividends as he effortlessly slotted his kicks on goal and for the most part made sensible place kicking decisions. Australia looked competent but not overly exciting and Israel Folau’s defensive kicking at fullback into a swirling wind left much to be desired.

However at halftime, the scores were relatively even with it being 14-11 in the Springboks’ favour. Watching the dressing rooms at halftime for me was the key as to who was going to win this game. The Wallaby dressing room looked pensive and calm, whereas I was appalled to see South African coach Heineke Meyer gesticulating wildly like some demented Jack in the Box to his charges urging them to lob the ball high for the team to chase. Given the wild, swirling and unpredictable windy conditions in Perth, this was pure madness! Sure enough rather than use their common sense, the Springboks decided to take their coach’s advice and seemed surprised that kick after kick either went out on the full, or didn’t make touch and landed comfortably in the arms of a rushing Wallaby pack, causing endless knock-ons and scenes reminiscent of a volleyball match rather than a rugby game.

Add to this the fact that Morne Steyn’s game deteriorated dramatically in the second half, and the writing was on the wall for the Springboks. Although they initially pulled ahead – the last twenty minutes saw the Springboks make some staggeringly basic errors. The Wallabies didn’t play well they -just simply capitalised on mistake after mistake made by the Springboks, namely through a reliance on a kicking game in conditions that were completely unsuitable for such an approach. There has been regular criticism in the South African press of the Springboks kicking away perfectly good possession and this was to be seen to the full in Perth. Australia did have moments of brilliance, especially once Israel Folau got to link up with his Waratahs’ teammate Kurtley Beale who for this game was sensibly called off the bench to play in the position that best suits him of centre.

There is no question that the sin binning of Bryan Habana for an alleged high tackle by referee George Clancy with just over ten minutes left in the game, had a huge impact. This was made worse by the fact that the assistant referee urged Clancy to not give Habana a yellow card as it was only a penalty and not a card offence. However Clancy decided to ignore the view of his assistant referee who had been right on the spot when the offence occurred. The replay clearly showed there had been no intent in the tackle and it was an unfortunate accident in the run of play. As unfortunate as this was and given the inconsistency in refereeing as the exact same tackle had been made on Jean de Villiers ten minutes earlier by a Wallaby player with no mention, South Africa still had no reason to cite this as the reason they lost the game. They have beaten better sides with close score lines and ten minutes to go with 14 men in the past. Instead, they played poorly made terrible decisions and ultimately paid the price of seeing Australia cross the white line at the last gasp and Bernard Foley get the conversion to ensure that Australia took the spoils.

In the end Australia squeaked home the victors but it wasn’t convincing. South Africa did take some positives from the game, their scrum and lineouts finally seemed to repair themselves though I can’t help feeling that this was only due to the fact that they were up against inferior opposition, but to be honest that’s about it. Even star fullback Willie le Roux couldn’t seem to make head nor tail of the wind and as a result spent much of the game making wild kicks and positioning himself poorly in relation to the ball. As for Australia, they made much of their victory but I for one am not convinced. Both teams head into this weekend with serious concerns. If the Springboks play like they have in these first three outings I fear they will be slaughtered by a rampant All Black side brimming with confidence and talent. Australia have too many question marks to be able to face up to a Pumas side that is on the brink of greatness. Both Ewen McKenzie and Heineke Meyer as coaches of the two most lacklustre sides in the competition have an enormous amount of work to do in the coming week.

 

Fixtures this weekend

New Zealand vs South Africa – Wellington

Based on South Africa’s performance to date, one can’t help get the feeling that this will be an unpleasant outing for the Springboks. Rain and wind are predicted and if Heineke Meyer fails to learn the error of his game plan from similar conditions last week in Perth and once more insists on kicking away good possession, then the All Blacks will run rings around the Springboks.

However, here is the conundrum – as awful as South Africa are at the moment this is one fixture which they somehow manage to always rise to. The fact that it is one of International Rugby’s great rivalries seems to somehow cause the Springboks to find that something extra in their game. Therefore I doubt it will be the rout that many are predicting.

Nevertheless there are concerns. Given the magnitude of the task facing them and the sheer quality of the opposition, I was once again amazed to see that Meyer has selected Handre Pollard as the starting fly-half. The youngster somehow seems to have a special place in Heineke Meyer’s heart, but as I questioned Meyer’s game plan last week, once again I question his wisdom this week. Morne Steyn is not even on the bench and while I agree he had a shocker of a game last weekend in Perth, he is still a proven quantity. All good players have off days, and I would put last weekend’s performance by Steyn as a case in point. A Springbok/All Black clash is about as intense as International rugby gets and is not the place for an inexperienced fly half such as Pollard to cut his teeth, especially when he has failed to impress in his previous two Test outings in the competition. Furthermore, in place of Morne Steyn, Pat Lambie has his first go on the bench as the replacement fly half. Lambie is a quality fly half but as witnessed in the Super Rugby quarter final in New Zealand this year, still lacks big match temperament and calmness and therefore I would argue is a liability.

New Zealand is having no such problems as they see the return of the spectacular Aaron Cruden at Number 10. They are fielding a completely proven side against South Africa, including the bench, and there is no doubt that on paper and at home they will unequivocally be the favourites for this fixture. Like South Africa they will be fired up and passions will run high for this one, but in addition to the passion unlike South Africa they have the skill level to match up to it.

I hope to be pleasantly surprised, and have the chance to watch a thrilling and tight encounter between the two best sides in the world but I am not betting on it. I sadly fear that the match will very much show us how far ahead New Zealand is and how quickly South Africa is starting to slide down the global rugby order. Let’s hope that South Africa finally use this fixture to show the world that they are still a rugby force to be reckoned with and contenders for the Webb Ellis Trophy next year.

Australia vs Argentina – Brisbane

As a closet Pumas supporter I like many people am really looking forward to this game and ultimately think it is the most exciting prospect of the weekend. Australia have so far failed to impress whilst Argentina are building momentum with every match in this tournament. Most people are convinced that their first ever win in this Championship is on the cards this year and Australia are unquestionably the target. The key question is can Argentina remain completely focused for the full 80 minutes and not let up in their concentration and intensity?

If they can do this then I am sure this game is theirs. They have run South Africa close and could have won both games as well as making the world’s best team the All Blacks work extremely hard for 80 minutes. The Pumas are motivated, focused and hungry for a win. Australia know this and will bring their A game to Brisbane on Saturday. The Wallabies will not want to go down in history as the side that gave Argentina their first win in the competition especially as they will then have to face Argentina again at home.

However, with the exception of the backline, Argentina on paper outclasses Australia in all areas of the game. It is how Australia uses its devastating backline and the phenomenal Israel Folau that will determine who walks away with the prize on Saturday in Brisbane. Argentina will dominate them in the scrums and at the breakdown and Nicolas Sanchez at fly half is easily the equal of Bernard Foley and many would argue a much more enterprising player. Argentina’s centres are quality and their wings and fullback are a force to be reckoned with. They may not have quite the pace of Australia’s backline but if they get good quick ball from the forwards and good service from Argentina’s halfbacks then they can contain the danger posed by Israel Folau. The difference for me is that Argentina is a complete team, whereas Australia has brilliant superstars but who lack the ability to play well as a team. This I think will be the key that separates the two on Saturday.

In that regard I think that Argentina may just have the edge if they last the full 80 minutes and as a result I am putting my bet on the Pumas, not by much but a narrow win by one or two points. For this match at least we are fortunate in having one of the better referees available at the moment and this should prove to be a cracker!

Rugby Championship 2014 – Round 3 preview

Fixtures this weekend

New Zealand vs Argentina – Napier

While, there is little doubt that New Zealand are the favourites to walk away with a win from this match and easily take first place in the competition standings, it won’t be done without considerable effort and Argentina will cause problems for the All Blacks especially through their outstanding forward pack. The days where the All Blacks could write off a match against the Pumas as a training match are long gone. Furthermore, despite the anomaly of the Pumas being winless so far in the competition, this Pumas side and Daniel Hourcade’s coaching style have seriously impressed their opposition. South Africa, Australia and New Zealand have all remarked on the talent in the Pumas current lineup and Argentina has earned some serious respect from the “Big Three”.

So what’s likely to happen in Napier on Saturday? Firstly the weather does not look to be too kind and although not on the biblical proportions of Pretoria, will nevertheless slow down the ball and make running it less of an option. This provides Argentina an excellent opportunity to take on the All Blacks up front. If they can maintain constant pressure on the All Blacks at the breakdown which they have shown they are more than capable of doing, shut down the opportunities for New Zealand out wide and generally keep the ball in tight with their forwards given the potentially slippery ground – they will find gaps in the All Blacks’ defence. This will both rattle and irritate New Zealand to the point where they will start giving away penalties, as we have seen so many times before, especially now as referees have key All Black players like Richie McCaw on their radar.

While I cannot see Argentina winning the game, a strong showing by them against the best team in the world will be a massive confidence booster going into the next round against a questionable Australian outfit, especially up front. Therefore, I think Argentina’s expectations of this game are not necessarily to win but to really make the All Blacks uncomfortable and run them close, gaining the Pumas even more respect.

New Zealand are unlikely to underestimate the quality of this Pumas side, as they have tended to do in the past. In the last three years, there have been periods of serious discomfort for the All Blacks during this fixture in the Championship. Ironically Argentina seems to play better against the All Blacks in New Zealand than they do at home. New Zealand will also not be fielding the same team that annihilated Australia two weeks ago. Aaron Cruden will not participate in this game due to injury and is ably replaced by Beauden Barrett at fly half.   However as impressive as Barrett can be, he certainly has an equal in Nicolas Sanchez of Argentina. It will be the battle of the fly halves and the forwards that will determine this game, especially given the forecast wet weather. New Zealand’s experience ultimately will still probably win the day, but they are definitely going to have to work for it. In short a fascinating fixture awaits us.

Australia vs South Africa – Perth

It’s interesting that in many ways this is the game that will really determine where everyone stands in the Rugby Championship at the halfway point in the tournament.   Unless Argentina pulls off a miracle in Napier then sadly despite being one of the most impressive teams, they sadly do not have the results that reflect their performance on the field. Of the four teams, the only two that have put in impressive performances have been Argentina and New Zealand – in the case of New Zealand this was only in the second game and both of Argentina’s games were outstanding but without the sought after result. So at this stage the question is whose scalp is Argentina going to take on their first ever win? Meanwhile New Zealand seems to be settling into invincible mode.

That leaves us with the two contenders in this fixture who so far have singularly failed to impress their fans and critics. South Africa have been for the most part woeful, despite clawing out two lacklustre victories at the last minute, while Australia benefitted from an off-form New Zealand in their first game, only to be subsequently made a laughing stock by the All Blacks the following week.

There has been much talk in the South African and Australian press in the last two weeks about lessons learned and how both sides are brimming with potential that is just not being fully utilised. The coaching staff have been well and truly put under the microscope in both countries, especially in South Africa where many are questioning Heineke Meyer’s so called game plan or as many believe lack of one.

As a result in many ways this weekend’s game between South Africa and Australia is of enormous importance to both sides’ morale and confidence, as well as showing the world where these two teams stand in the global pecking order.

Australia know if they falter then the Pumas will arrive next weekend smelling victory and opportunities to be had, while South Africa know that if they don’t put a decent score line between them and the Wallabies they too will suffer horrifically at the hands of the All Blacks in New Zealand a week later. Therefore for both sides a simple win by a few points will simply not be good enough – an all-out barnstorming victory with a 15 to 20 point difference in the score line is the only option, and one which their fans will expect.

The changes to the Springbok side, and Heineke Meyer realising the futility of recent experimentation, sees a more settled Springbok side with considerably more experience running onto the field in Perth. Most Springbok supporters are breathing a great sigh of relief to see Morne Steyn starting at 10. The forward pack looks more settled as well, with a good balance of youth and experience, though like most people I am surprised at the willingness to try and reinvent Victor Matfield’s career. As great a player as he was I am not really sure he has another World Cup in him at his age. South Africa need to get their younger players the game time and experience they need for next year’s rugby showpiece. Although Meyer has tried to do this in the past two games, his choices were inappropriate given the intensity of this tournament. It would have made more sense to blood some of these younger and less experienced players on the European tour in November, where the intensity of matches is there but not the level of competition coupled with the public’s expectations of the Rugby Championship.

On paper these are essentially two completely equal sides, and as a result it will be almost impossible to call. Australia still have issues in the forward department, but then so do South Africa and this weekend will show which of the two has done their homework better. Like Meyer, Australian coach Ewen Mckenzie has realized the error of his ways in trying unproven halfback combinations and this match sees the out of place Kurtley Beale sitting on the bench as opposed to starting at number 10. As for the backs, once again Australia’s back three are the equal of their South African counterparts – it will just come down to which team plays a complete 15 man game on Saturday and does so for the full 80 minutes.

Canadian Rugby Roundup

This week we take a quick look at Canada’s fixtures in Europe this autumn. I was surprised to see many citing these fixtures as excellent preparation for Canada’s campaign in next year’s Rugby World Cup. I for one, although not denying the value of the games, can’t help being disappointed at the quality of the opposition we are up against.

So who do we have to test our spurs against over a four week period? Samoa, Namibia and Romania. Of these three I would argue the only real test will be Samoa as a judge of where we stand in our preparation for next year’s World Cup. This is not to devalue the importance of the games against Namibia and Romania or to show any disrespect to the rugby played by these two countries, especially as Romania will be in our pool at next year’s World Cup. However, if Canada is to compete and hold its head high amongst the world’s best next year then we need some more quality opposition. I was very disheartened to see that we are not playing any of the Six Nations or Rugby Championship countries. The fact that we are not playing any of our major pool opponents, France, Italy or Ireland is inexcusable. Although I am sure the considerable financial opportunities available to the US Rugby Union helped to facilitate the All Blacks playing the USA in Chicago as the All Blacks make their way to Europe in October – could we not have had a similar match up against Australia in Vancouver as they make their way to Europe? I still hold to my point last week that Canada should be striving to play a country like Argentina once a year. I am still convinced that the story of Argentina has many lessons for Canada. Argentina ten years ago is where Canada is now and look how far the Pumas have come in ten years and the respect they are given by the big rugby nations of Europe and the Southern Hemisphere.

I am sure that in the professional era, it is all sponsors and bums on seats that decides who gets to play who, but surely Canada is enough of a pull to get at least one game against one of the Six Nations countries. It is my hope that Rugby Canada takes this on board and somehow ensures that at least in June next year, Canada gets to play one of the top ten nations both at home and away. Without this kind of exposure it is unlikely that we will cause any big upsets next year at the World Cup which is sad given the talent we have, and the recent spectacular Canadian performance and success at the Women’s World Cup. Rugby Canada has some serious homework to do between now and September 2015.

A Role Model for Canadian Rugby

After the excitement of the Womens’ World Cup and Canada’s outstanding effort, it has been a quiet week and not much to report. However after watching the first two rounds of the Rugby Championship, it left me with food for thought on how we might find a role model for Canada’s own development of its national side.

So let me throw this out there if Rugby Canada might read this. On watching Argentina’s performance in the Rugby Championship I would dare to suggest that this is a country that Canada could use as a role model in how to develop the national team into a top quality side capable of holding their own against the world’s best.

You may be surprised at this but let’s look at the similarities between the game in Argentina and Canada of which there are many.

In both countries rugby is a minority sport, which cannot hope to compete with the primary national sporting passions – in Argentina it is football and in Canada it is hockey. However, both countries are hugely patriotic and any sporting spectacle on the international stage which allows a Canadian or Argentinian jersey to be shown to the world automatically generates fierce and passionate interest across the country. In the case of rugby this is arguably stronger in Argentina but this is more due to the growing successes of the national team. Recall the giant screens in Buenos Aires that aired the Pumas semi-final match in the 2007 World Cup which saw them finish third in the tournament, and the resulting celebrations throughout the country on Argentina’s victory in the bronze medal match. I for one believe that if Canada ever reached a similar position at the World Cup the same interest and enthusiasm would be seen. Let’s face it, we are a nation of big people who love fast contact sports – we were custom built for rugby. There is no doubt that when played well at the International level rugby is a sport well suited to igniting national passions and huge interest. It is worth noting that the third most watched sporting event on television throughout the world, after the Olympics and the Football World Cup, is the Rugby World Cup – and the 2015 Championship looks set to continue this trend.

In both Argentina and Canada there is a very small domestic playing base and competition structure, centred on one or two key geographic areas. In Argentina it is the winelands and Buenos Aires whereas in Canada, British Columbia is undoubtedly the heartland of the sport. In Canada, the sport is an amateur code, which for the most part is also true in Argentina at the domestic level. The essential difference is that the Argentinian union has been highly effective in getting its players exposure to European top level clubs and helping them secure lucrative professional contracts overseas. In the last ten years all the top European professional clubs have at least two or three Argentinian players in their squads, often in their starting XVs on any match day. In the case of French rugby these percentages are even higher. The benefit of this regular exposure to top level rugby week in week out throughout the European season has been instrumental in contributing to Argentina’s continuous improvements as a national side. Argentina’s inclusion since 2012 in the Rugby Championship, the Southern Hemisphere’s premier annual international tournament has been a further boost to developing a national side that can compete with the world’s best.

The Argentinian Rugby Union has recognised that in order to capture the imagination of the public at home and generate a greater interest in the sport, developing a national squad that can gain international recognition and success is key. Although, national unions should always strive to develop the game domestically, you still need an attractive product and something that players can aspire to. As Argentina’s stature at the international level continues to increase so too will interest by professional European clubs in Argentinian players. This in turn will expand the domestic playing base and number of players available for local and club teams in Argentina as these players are attracted to the game and the possibility of gaining valuable and lucrative experience in Europe and the ultimate prize of representing Argentina at the international level.

Canada could do the same, as well as learning from Argentina’s experience and approach to the development of their national team. To further this process if time and funding permitted a regular annual international fixture between Argentina and Canada could be held. Although Canada participates in the annual Pacific Rim Competition the countries it plays against in this tournament are not quite of the same calibre as Argentina.

The fact that Argentina has managed to become such a success in international rugby is no small feat given its relative geographic isolation from the rest of the rugby world, its small domestic playing base and national obsession almost to the point of religious devotion with football. Canada is in a very similar position and could learn a great deal from the Argentinian experience, and ultimately replicate its success. It will take time and Argentina’s success has been 20 years in the making but the rewards and results are there for all of us to see. So from the Pampas to the Prairies let’s get to know our rugby that much better!

Rugby Championship 2014 – Round two

New Zealand vs Australia
Final score – NZ 51/Aus 20
Auckland

By now most of us will have recovered our breath from what was an absolutely stunning All Black performance at the expense of the Wallabies. As I mentioned in last week’s edition, I felt that the All Blacks would be the more effective team in learning the lessons that needed to be learnt from the previous encounter in Sydney. I was not proved wrong. Whatever failings New Zealand may have had in Sydney, they were completely absent from the team’s display in Auckland. Australia on the other hand were poor and if anything regressed from their efforts in Sydney. In short they were annihilated by a dynamic All Black team who demonstrated their mastery of every aspect of the game.

There were some positives for Australia but they were few and far between. Michael Hooper’s individual try was inspirational even though it was more of a consolation than the impetus needed to spark Australia into life. Matt Toomua at 12 was also exciting to watch and could have done so much more had he had the support he needed from the rest of his teammates. Australia’s scrum also held up relatively well, though watching the Pumas’ utter dominance of the Springboks’ forward pack, Coach Ewen McKenzie must be feeling quite terrified at the prospect of his two encounters with the Pumas. It appears that McKenzie has perhaps realized the error of his ways by substituting Bernard Foley in for Kurtley Beale at fly half during the second half – a decision that should never have had to been made in the first place.

So where to begin with New Zealand and the master class display of the tournament so far? New Zealand answered every single question put to them by their critics last weekend and showed the world once again that they are still the benchmark team to beat. Although it was a complete team performance, there were so many players who had individual performances that deserve special mention. For me there were four displays that really stood out. Brodie Retallick at number 4 was the stuff of legends. The gigantic lock was utterly devastating and despite his size showed the pace and speed of a winger at times as he smashed through the Australian defences creating huge gaps and spaces for New Zealand’s backs. Aaron Smith the feisty scrum half was always right behind him making sure that the opportunities Retallick kept creating provided quick ball for New Zealand’s backline, causing Australia to look disorganised and frayed in their defence and constantly having to play catch up. In the lineout Retallick and Whitelock denied their Australian counterparts any decent ball, and these two skyscrapers made the lineout a weak option for Australia. Australia’s shouted lineout commands looked more like calls to avoid throwing the ball to Retallick or Whitelock rather than calls for plays from the coaching playbook.

At fly half, Aaron Cruden was probably the player of the weekend. With the exception of Argentina’s Nicolas Sanchez, Cruden showed the other teams what they are lacking in this position. Going into this tournament there was much talk of New Zealand not having the legendary Dan Carter at Number 10 at least for the initial games. Aaron Cruden has proved that he is more than capable of stepping into Carter’s shoes and in many ways with each game is proving himself to be Carter’s equal. Cruden is intelligent enough to know that he perhaps does not have Carter’s kicking game, and also knows his opposition well enough to realize when to use the boot and when not to. Cruden plays his position differently to Dan Carter and relies more on his blistering pace and skill with ball in hand. Cruden consistently saw holes in Australia’s defence and was into them like a shot, which then released the rest of New Zealand’s backline who thrived on running the ball out wide. Indeed New Zealand’s ball handling and passing skills in Auckland this weekend were mesmerising to watch. Cruden’s kicking for goal was faultless and in that area he is comfortably Dan Carter’s equal if not better.

Julian Savea on the wing provided us with thrilling displays of his running skills and made several long deep cuts down the outside into Australian territory, ultimately resulting in one of the best tries of the game. Also impressive in defence, Savea showed his pace and why he is regarded as such a threat by opposition defences.

Lastly, although substituted midway through the second half, for the impressive Aaron Cruden, Beauden Barrett showed once more what depth New Zealand have especially at Number 10. Barrett, just like Cruden, covered huge areas of the park and was everywhere, and his try saving tackle on Israel Folau was undoubtedly one of the best plays of the match.

In short New Zealand were breathtaking. They are on a roll now and having put their opening jitters well and truly to rest, will only get better with each successive game. As a result I can’t help feeling that the tournament is already decided. New Zealand will take the spoils, and the Rugby Championship in terms of a competition will revert to its old Tri Nations format – the Tri this time being Argentina, Australia and South Africa with New Zealand simply using their games against these three countries as warmup matches for the World Cup next year.

As an aside to this match, French referee Romain Poite’s handling of the game should also be mentioned in honorable dispatches. There had been much controversy surrounding South African referee Jaco Peyper’s officiating of this fixture the week before. Romain Poite however was consistent and solid in his management of the game, allowing for a fast flowing and open game with minimal delays particularly around the scrums. He was fair and showed no favouritism and the yellow card that New Zealand’s Richie McCaw received was totally justifiable with even the All Blacks coach Steve Hansen supporting Poite’s decision in the post-game commentary. Poite was superb in explaining his calls to the players and this was reflected in a notable absence of backchat to the referee which we see sadly all too often after the referee’s whistle has blown.

 

Argentina vs South Africa
Final score – Arg 31/SA 33
Salta

The press correctly predicted an epic struggle and that is precisely what we got in this “scorcher in Salta”. This game was equally as exciting as the one in Auckland and I like many was gutted that Argentina could not ultimately walk away with the spoils. The Pumas’ bugbear of not being able to close out big games like this came back to haunt them in the last 15 minutes of a game that on paper they should have won.

Argentina for the first three quarters of the game completely outclassed the Springboks and provided us with an exciting, disciplined and highly focused demonstration of how to play rugby. The Pumas front three obliterated their South African counterparts at scrum time – South Africa simply had no answers. Nicolas Sanchez at fly half and the two scrum halves, Landajo and Cubelli were far superior to Ruan Pienaar and the woeful Handre Pollard and it was only with the long overdue calling up from the bench of Morne Steyn to the Number 10 position that South Africa finally started to front up to Argentina in this area. At centre Juan Hernandez once more showed his world class pedigree along with the always reliable Marcelo Bosch at the expense of South Africa’s Jean De Villiers and De Allende (De Allende was more like the invisible man for much of the match – Mr. Meyer please take note in future selections). Lastly although Habana and Hendricks did impress for South Africa and it was Hendricks try which ultimately swung the match back in the Springboks favour; Argentina’s back three were a revelation. Pablo Matero was fast and strong on the wing along with Amorosino and Tuculet at fullback was the player of the weekend in this position. South Africa’s fullback, the very impressive Willie le Roux had a good game but without the support of the rest of his pack, which Tuculet had in bucket loads he was just not as electric as his Argentinian counterpart and was left to scramble back in defence more than he obviously would have liked.

Despite Argentina’s stellar display of rugby, they once again couldn’t manage to keep it up for the full 80 minutes despite an impressive late surge in the dying minutes of the game. At the hour mark, the game looked sewn up for Argentina with a spread of more than ten points. However it was here as I have seen so often in the Pumas game, they perhaps become slightly relaxed and a five minute lapse in intensity and concentration allowed Cornal Hendricks to burst through and score out wide. There is no doubt that this was the turning point in the game. Some long overdue replacements off the bench by Meyer added new confidence and motivation to a brow beaten Springbok side. The always reliable Morne Steyn guided his troops back into finding the right spaces in a slightly tired looking Pumas defence. Argentina managed to regain their composure in the last few minutes of the game as they too were galvanised by a massive penalty kick from far out by Marcelo Bosch against the wind. The last two nail biting minutes saw Argentina once again regain momentum through their forwards but a momentary lapse in discipline close to the South African line saw the ball back in South African hands followed by the last blast of referee Steve Walsh’s whistle. The faces of the Pumas players said it all. So agonisingly close yet so painfully far. However, they can take heart in giving us a thrilling spectacle. If they can take the lessons to be learnt from these two games and hopefully not be too disheartened by the schooling they are likely to receive next from the All Blacks, I still believe that if they maintain their current momentum, a win either away or at home against Australia is still not beyond the realms of possibility.

As for South Africa, quite simply for the majority of the game they were poor, not helped by the fact that Argentina really were that good. Coach Heineke Meyer going up against Australia next has some SERIOUS work to do. This is not a world beating Springbok side and they are likely in for a massive thrashing both home and away to the All Blacks. They may fare better against the Wallabies but even there I am not holding my breath. At the moment South Africa lacks serious cohesion in their squad and are tending to look to players who I for one think are past their prime. The DuPlessis, De Villiers, Habanas, Bothas and Matfields are experienced players but far from the peak of their skill and fitness levels. The new crop of players that Meyer seems to be favouring have so far failed to impress me. Pollard at Fly Half simply is not suited to this kind of intensity of rugby. The supposed find of the year De Allende at centre was nowhere to be seen in Argentina; in total I think he carried the ball once. Even the potentially brilliant le Roux at fullback seems to be struggling to find his pace in a disjointed and at times dysfunctional side. The fact that Meyer did not start Morne Steyn at fly half in this game given what was at stake has left many South Africans scratching their heads in bewilderment. Meyer seemed to recognize the error of his ways in the last quarter of the game and his use of the bench reflected this as the substitutions he made changed the game completely. However we cannot help but wonder if these substitution players had started the game how much more different in character the game would have been.

I will grudgingly admit that the Springboks showed character in digging in and coming back from an almost hopeless position in the last quarter of the game. Ultimately they were the victors but far from convincingly. I hold to my opinion that Heineke Meyer is not the man to take them to the World Cup next year, but with a year to go it is too late to change the coach now. The Springboks and South African management as a result will have to work exceptionally hard over the next year to convince the rest of the world that this is a rugby nation that has lifted the Webb Ellis trophy twice and has the potential to do so again. Right now the jury is out.

In conclusion, South Africa bizarrely head into the next round of the competition with two wins to their belt and thus sit at the top of the table in the tournament, while Argentina sits at the bottom of the table despite having outplayed South Africa twice and having been much more impressive than third placed Australia – the vagaries of mathematics I guess. If South Africa has learned anything from the last two weeks, it is that they have found their “problem opponents”. The big three Southern Hemisphere nations each seem to have a team that they struggle with especially at the World Cup – for New Zealand it is France, for the Australians it seems to be Ireland and for South Africa we have seen in the last three years it is unquestionably Argentina, making these fixtures ones to always look forward to.

Women’s Rugby World Cup 2014 – The final

Although the final of the Women’s Rugby World Cup didn’t quite produce the spectacle and sense of elation from a Canadian perspective that last weekend’s game did, a huge step forward was taken by a very courageous and talented Canadian women’s team at Sunday’s final.

England emerged victorious 21-9 and lifted the trophy but Canada was by no means a pushover.  England were devastatingly effective in denying Canada quick ball, knowing that if Canada’s backline were given room to run there would be no stopping them. Ultimately it comes down to planning and knowing your opponent and denying them their strengths. In this the English women’s team gave all of us a lesson in how to prepare for a World Cup final and come out the winners.

Canada can still feel proud of their second place finish and how they lit up the tournament at times with some breathtaking displays of rugby. This was recognised by Canada’s winger Magali Harvey being voted Women’s Player of the Year by the IRB, with Canada’s Captain Kelly Russell also getting favourable mention.

As Canadians we should all feel proud of the efforts of this remarkable and inspirational group of women, and I hope that the enthusiasm for the game of rugby in general that this tournament generated as well as interest in our Women’s and Men’s teams will only continue to grow and result in more success in the future.